Claimant v Super Network Solutions Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. As this is a Rule 22 default judgment, the respondent did not participate and the claim was determined in the claimant's favour.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. As this is a Rule 22 default judgment, the respondent did not participate and the claim was determined in the claimant's favour.
Facts
The claimant brought claims for unauthorised deduction from wages and unpaid holiday pay against his former employer, Super Network Solutions Limited. The respondent did not enter a response or participate in the proceedings. The tribunal issued a default judgment under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024.
Decision
The tribunal found in favour of the claimant on both claims. The respondent was ordered to pay £591.57 for unauthorised deductions from wages and £271.86 for unpaid holiday entitlement, totalling £863.43. This was a default judgment made in the respondent's absence.
Practical note
Where a respondent fails to engage with tribunal proceedings, a claimant can obtain a default judgment for wage and holiday pay claims without a full hearing.
Award breakdown
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 6016017/2025
- Decision date
- 15 September 2025
- Hearing type
- rule 21
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- default
Respondent
- Sector
- technology
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No