Claimant v Royal Mail Group Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found the claimants' complaints about unpaid wages were not well founded. The tribunal heard evidence and submissions from both parties and determined that the respondent had not made unlawful deductions from the claimants' wages.
Facts
Three claimants, Mr A Payne, Mr A Grieve, and Mr P Sheldon, brought claims against Royal Mail Group Limited alleging unpaid wages. The hearing proceeded with two claimants attending in person, while Mr Sheldon did not attend. The respondent was represented by a solicitor, Mr Chaudhry. The tribunal heard oral evidence and submissions from both sides regarding the wage claims.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed all three claims, finding that the complaints about unpaid wages were not well founded. The tribunal gave its reasons orally at the hearing and concluded that the respondent had not made unlawful deductions from the claimants' wages.
Practical note
Claims for unlawful deduction of wages against Royal Mail Group Limited failed where the claimants, appearing unrepresented, could not establish that wages were properly due and unpaid.
Case details
- Case number
- 3300630/2024
- Decision date
- 15 September 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- logistics
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- solicitor
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No