Cases2302252/2024

Claimant v Hilton Nursing Partners Ltd

12 September 2025Before Employment Judge ArmstrongLondon Southremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£52,795

Individual claims

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)succeeded

The tribunal found at the liability hearing on 12 September 2025 that the respondent discriminated against the claimant contrary to section 15 Equality Act 2010 by unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability (migraine and anxiety/depression) by issuing a first written warning on 10 November 2023 and dismissing her on 11 December 2023.

Facts

The claimant was dismissed on 11 December 2023 (effective 18 December 2023) after being issued a first written warning on 10 November 2023. She suffered from migraines and depression/anxiety (long-standing conditions). After dismissal she found work with Royal Mail in January 2024 but resigned in March 2024 as the physical demands were incompatible with her disabilities and her mental health deteriorated. She was unable to job-search from March to November 2024 due to severe mental health impact of the discrimination. She secured new employment with Kent County Council in March 2025, starting work in July 2025 after pre-employment checks.

Decision

The tribunal awarded £52,795.13 comprising loss of earnings (£28,552.25), injury to feelings (£15,000 in lower middle Vento band), 10% ACAS uplift (£4,355.22) and interest (£4,887.66). The tribunal rejected arguments that Royal Mail employment broke the chain of causation, accepting it was unsuitable and the claimant's mental health difficulties continued as a result of the discrimination. No aggravated damages awarded.

Practical note

Interim employment that proves incompatible with a claimant's disability does not necessarily break the chain of causation in discrimination claims, particularly where the discrimination has exacerbated underlying mental health conditions affecting the claimant's ability to sustain alternative work.

Award breakdown

Compensatory award£28,552
Injury to feelings£15,000
Interest£4,888

Vento band: middle

Award equivalent: 115.8 weeks' gross pay

Adjustments

ACAS uplift+10%

Respondent breached ACAS Code by telling claimant there was no point appealing the first written warning and by failing to refer claimant to occupational health to investigate her health issues. Tribunal awarded 10% uplift.

Legal authorities cited

Chagger v Abbey National Plc [2010] ICR 397Dench v Flynn and Partners [1998] IRLR 653Cowen v Rentokil Initial Facility Services (UK) Ltd EAT 0437/07Komeng v Creative support Ltd UKEAT/0275/18/JOJEddie Stobart Ltd v Graham [2024] EAT 14Shakil v Samsons Ltd [2024] EAT 192BAE Systems (operations) Ltd v Konczak [2018] ICR 1, CADe Souza v Vinci Construction (UK) Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1288Vento v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2003] ICR 318Armitage, Marsden and HM Prison Service v Johnson [1997] IRLR 162Ministry of Defence v Wheeler [1998] IRLR 23Fyfe v Scientific Furnishing Ltd [1989] IRLR 331

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.119Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 s.207Equality Act 2010 s.15Equality Act 2010 s.124

Case details

Case number
2302252/2024
Decision date
12 September 2025
Hearing type
remedy
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Employment details

Salary band
£20,000–£25,000

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor