Cases6011173/2024

Claimant v Yunex Ltd

12 September 2025Before Employment Judge Mr P CadneyBristol

Outcome

Other

Individual claims

Automatic Unfair Dismissalnot determined

Claimant asserts dismissal automatically unfair under s103A ERA 1996 as resigned as result of detriments suffered from public interest disclosures. Respondent applied for strike out, arguing disclosures have no reasonable prospect of being qualifying disclosures. Tribunal dismissed strike out application, finding arguments finely balanced and not appropriate to strike out at this stage before evidence heard.

Whistleblowingnot determined

Claimant alleges detriment for making protected disclosures regarding IKOS patent invention rights, Competition Act breach, and restriction on development of EV charging systems. Respondent applied for strike out arguing no public interest element. Tribunal dismissed strike out, finding correspondence contains disclosure of information and arguments on public interest finely balanced requiring full hearing.

Constructive Dismissalnot determined

Claimant alleges breaches of implied term of mutual trust and confidence including failure to engage with grievance, complaints about role/salary, IKOS patent disputes, and conduct of grievance process. Remains to be determined at final hearing.

Direct Discrimination(age)not determined

Claimant (aged 71, over nominal retirement age) alleges respondent failed to engage seriously with complaints/grievance because of his age, assuming he would soon retire and problem would 'go away'. Comparator is hypothetical person below retirement age (under 65).

Harassment(age)not determined

Claimant's amendment application to add age harassment allegations (s26 Equality Act 2010) was granted without objection. Allegations already before tribunal and harassment is statutory alternative to direct discrimination with limited prejudice to respondent.

Breach of Contractnot determined

Claimant claims notice pay on basis resignation amounted to constructive dismissal and he is entitled to payment in lieu. Remains to be determined at final hearing.

Unlawful Deduction from Wageswithdrawn

Claim for underpayment of salary (£262,040) withdrawn. Tribunal had indicated claim was likely misconceived as no legal obligation to pay more than contractual salary and no jurisdiction to award 'fair' pay.

Unlawful Deduction from Wageswithdrawn

Claim relating to deductions from pay/bonus in 2023 withdrawn by claimant.

Breach of Contractwithdrawn

Claim relating to IKOS intellectual property (seeking specific performance of contract to sell patent for 1 euro or damages potentially running to millions) withdrawn. Tribunal had warned claimant that tribunal has no jurisdiction for specific performance and damages limited to £25,000.

Breach of Contractwithdrawn

Claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay withdrawn by claimant.

Victimisationwithdrawn

Victimisation claim under s27 Equality Act 2010 withdrawn by claimant.

Facts

The claimant, a 71-year-old Senior Product Engineer employed from 2007 to May 2024, resigned claiming constructive dismissal. He alleged he invented an EV charging system (IKOS) but was denied recognition as sole inventor and the right to purchase the patent for 1 euro when the respondent decided not to develop it commercially. He claimed this and failures to address his complaints about his role and salary breached the implied term of trust and confidence, and that he suffered detriment for making protected disclosures about patent rights and Competition Act breaches. He also alleged age discrimination, claiming the respondent ignored his grievances assuming he would soon retire.

Decision

This was a preliminary hearing on strike out and amendment applications. The tribunal granted the claimant's application to amend to add age harassment allegations. It dismissed the respondent's strike out application regarding whistleblowing claims, finding the arguments on whether the disclosures were in the public interest were finely balanced and required a full hearing. Several claims including underpayment of salary, IKOS patent damages, and victimisation were withdrawn. The remaining claims proceed to final hearing.

Practical note

At strike out stage, tribunals will not determine finely balanced questions of law such as whether disclosures are in the public interest — such matters require full fact-finding at a merits hearing.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.103APatent ActERA 1996 s.43BEquality Act 2010 s.26Equality Act 2010 s.27Competition Act 1988

Case details

Case number
6011173/2024
Decision date
12 September 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
technology
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Employment details

Role
Senior Product Engineer
Service
17 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No