Cases2601554/2021

Claimant v University of Nottingham

11 September 2025Before Employment Judge Robin BroughtonMidlands East

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£46,921

Individual claims

Direct Discriminationsucceeded

The tribunal found breaches of the Equality Act 2010 which took place during the course of employment, prior to termination. The termination itself was not found to be a breach of the Equality Act 2010. Remedy was awarded at the lower end of the upper Vento band.

Facts

This is a remedy hearing following findings of discrimination during the claimant's employment at the University of Nottingham. The claimant represented himself while the respondent was represented by leading counsel. The tribunal had previously found breaches of the Equality Act 2010 occurring during employment, though the termination itself was not found to be discriminatory.

Decision

The tribunal awarded £28,000 for injury to feelings at the lower end of the upper Vento band, plus a £2,500 ACAS uplift for failure to follow proper procedures, and £16,120.64 in interest, totaling £46,920.64. The substantial award reflects serious discrimination during employment.

Practical note

Even where discrimination does not cause dismissal, serious acts during employment can attract upper-band Vento awards, and respondents risk ACAS uplifts if they fail to follow proper procedures in addressing discrimination complaints.

Award breakdown

Injury to feelings£28,000
Interest£16,121

Vento band: upper

Legal authorities cited

Vento v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2003] ICR 318

Statutes

Equality Act 2010TULR(C)A s.207A(2)The Employment Tribunals (Interest on Awards in Discrimination Cases) Regulations 1996

Case details

Case number
2601554/2021
Decision date
11 September 2025
Hearing type
remedy
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
education
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
No