Cases8000773/2025

Claimant v J. P. Morgan Europe Limited

10 September 2025Before Employment Judge D N JonesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Other

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalnot determined

This is a reconsideration judgment only. The claimant withdrew his claim immediately before a preliminary hearing on time bar, then sought reconsideration within an hour due to misunderstanding about ACAS conciliation requirements. The tribunal granted reconsideration and revoked the dismissal judgment. The substantive unfair dismissal claim has not yet been determined and will proceed to a preliminary hearing on the time bar issue.

Facts

The claimant was dismissed on 8 October 2024 for conduct reasons and filed an unfair dismissal claim on 30 March 2025, over 5 months later. A preliminary hearing was listed for 9 July 2025 to consider whether the claim was out of time. On 8 July 2025, the claimant sent an email withdrawing his claim, believing he needed to do so to pursue ACAS conciliation after the respondent made a settlement offer. Within an hour, he sent another email saying he had made a mistake. The claim was dismissed under Rule 51 on 8 July. The claimant applied for reconsideration, providing evidence from ACAS that the claim must remain live for them to act as mediator.

Decision

The tribunal granted the reconsideration application and revoked the judgment dismissing the claim. The judge found it was in the interests of justice to do so because the claimant was unrepresented, withdrew the claim based on a genuine misunderstanding about ACAS conciliation requirements, and brought this to the tribunal's attention within an hour. The case will now be relisted for a preliminary hearing on the time bar question.

Practical note

Unrepresented claimants who withdraw claims based on genuine misunderstandings about procedure, and who immediately seek to rectify the error, may successfully obtain reconsideration under the interests of justice test in Rule 68, even where this causes some prejudice to the respondent.

Legal authorities cited

Outasight VB Ltd v Brown [2015] ICR D11

Statutes

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure Rule 51Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure Rule 68Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure Rule 50

Case details

Case number
8000773/2025
Decision date
10 September 2025
Hearing type
reconsideration
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
financial services
Represented
Yes

Claimant representation

Represented
No