Cases6004125/2025

Claimant v Mediterranean Restaurant Brighton Limited

10 September 2025Before Employment Judge Rice-BirchallLondon Southremote video

Outcome

Partly successful£2,074

Individual claims

Holiday Paywithdrawn

Claim withdrawn by the claimant at the hearing and dismissed on withdrawal.

Wrongful Dismissalwithdrawn

Claim for notice pay withdrawn by the claimant at the hearing and dismissed on withdrawal.

Redundancy Paywithdrawn

Claim for redundancy payment withdrawn by the claimant at the hearing and dismissed on withdrawal.

Unlawful Deduction from Wageswithdrawn

Claim for arrears of pay (unauthorised deductions from wages) withdrawn by the claimant at the hearing and dismissed on withdrawal.

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found the dismissal was unfair. However, applying a Polkey reduction, the tribunal determined there was a 100% chance the claimant would have been fairly dismissed after a four-week consultation period, resulting in an award of four weeks' pay.

Facts

The claimant was employed by a Mediterranean restaurant in Brighton which entered voluntary liquidation. The claimant brought multiple claims including holiday pay, notice pay, redundancy payment, arrears of pay and unfair dismissal. The respondent did not appear at the remote hearing. The claimant withdrew most claims but proceeded with the unfair dismissal claim.

Decision

The tribunal found the dismissal was unfair but applied a 100% Polkey reduction on the basis that the claimant would have been fairly dismissed after a four-week consultation period in any event. The claimant was awarded compensatory damages representing four weeks' pay totalling £2,074.07.

Practical note

Even where a dismissal is found to be procedurally unfair, a 100% Polkey reduction can leave a claimant with only minimal compensation reflecting the period proper procedure would have taken.

Award breakdown

Compensatory award£2,074

Adjustments

Polkey reduction100%

100% chance that the claimant would have been fairly dismissed in any event, after a four-week consultation period

Legal authorities cited

Case details

Case number
6004125/2025
Decision date
10 September 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
hospitality
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No