Claimant v Fly Studios Ltd
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found the dismissal was unfair. The respondent failed to attend the hearing to defend the claim, and the claimant provided sufficient evidence to establish that the dismissal was unfair under the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal found the redundancy pay claim was not well founded. This suggests that either the claimant was not dismissed by reason of redundancy, or she did not meet the qualifying criteria for a statutory redundancy payment.
The tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully deducted wages from the claimant, awarding £891.76 net for unpaid wages and £1,440 gross for unpaid pension contributions. The respondent's failure to attend meant these deductions were not justified.
The tribunal found the respondent breached the claimant's contract by failing to pay notice pay. The claimant was awarded £2,305.98 net representing damages for this breach.
The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to payment for unpaid accrued annual leave of £516.94 gross, representing holiday entitlement that had accrued but not been paid or taken at termination.
Facts
Mrs Bains was employed by Fly Studios Ltd. Her employment was terminated and she brought claims for unfair dismissal, redundancy pay, unlawful deductions from wages (including unpaid pension contributions), breach of contract for notice pay, and unpaid holiday pay. The respondent failed to attend the hearing.
Decision
The tribunal found in favour of the claimant on all claims except redundancy pay. The respondent's non-attendance meant the claims were largely undefended. The tribunal awarded a total of £17,110.72 comprising unfair dismissal awards, notice pay, unpaid wages, pension contributions and holiday pay.
Practical note
Non-attendance by a respondent at a tribunal hearing will typically result in judgment for the claimant if the claims are properly founded and supported by evidence.
Award breakdown
Case details
- Case number
- 6003383/2025
- Decision date
- 10 September 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Name
- Fly Studios Ltd
- Sector
- media
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No