Cases6007796/2025

Claimant v Willow Hall Residential Care Home Limited

10 September 2025Before Employment Judge S Poveyon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out pursuant to Rule 38 for not being actively pursued. The Claimant failed to respond to the Tribunal's order of 29 May 2025 requiring representations or a hearing request within 14 days.

Facts

Sasha Allsup brought an employment claim against Willow Hall Residential Care Home Limited. On 29 May 2025, the Tribunal issued an order requiring the Claimant to make representations or request a hearing within 14 days as to why the claim should not be struck out for non-pursuit. The Claimant did not respond to this order.

Decision

The Tribunal struck out the claim under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the ground that it was not being actively pursued, after the Claimant failed to respond to the unless order.

Practical note

Unrepresented claimants must respond to tribunal orders and actively pursue their claims or face strike-out for non-pursuit under Rule 38.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 Rule 38

Case details

Case number
6007796/2025
Decision date
10 September 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No