Cases3303077/2024

Claimant v Colour Marketing Services Limited

9 September 2025Before Employment Judge M. HuntBury Saint Edmunds

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalfailed

The tribunal found the claim of unfair dismissal contrary to Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well-founded and dismissed it. Reasons were given orally at the hearing.

Wrongful Dismissalfailed

The tribunal found the claim of wrongful dismissal was not well-founded and dismissed it. Reasons were given orally at the hearing.

Facts

Mr Biss brought claims of unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal against his former employer Colour Marketing Services Limited. The claimant attended the hearing in person without representation. The respondent did not attend the hearing. The tribunal heard the case and delivered oral reasons.

Decision

The tribunal found that both the unfair dismissal claim under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and the wrongful dismissal claim were not well-founded and dismissed them both. Detailed reasons were given orally at the hearing.

Practical note

Even where a respondent fails to attend a hearing, a claimant must still prove their case on the merits and the tribunal will not automatically find in their favour.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 Part X

Case details

Case number
3303077/2024
Decision date
9 September 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
professional services
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No