Claimant v Royal Mail Group Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was not well-founded. The claim was dismissed following a full merits hearing, with oral reasons given to the parties.
Facts
Mr Omran was employed by Royal Mail Group Limited and brought a claim for unauthorised deductions from wages. The case was heard by video at Reading. The claimant was represented by a trade union official and the respondent by a solicitor. Oral reasons were given at the hearing.
Decision
The Employment Tribunal dismissed the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages, finding it not well-founded. The tribunal provided oral reasons at the hearing but did not issue written reasons as none were requested.
Practical note
An unlawful deduction from wages claim against Royal Mail failed on its merits, demonstrating the importance of establishing entitlement to the wages claimed.
Case details
- Case number
- 6022416/2024
- Decision date
- 2 September 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- logistics
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- solicitor
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- union