Claimant v PJ Bond Construction Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found the claim for unlawful deduction of wages under Part 2 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to be well-founded. The Claimant was owed 10 days pay at £230 per day which had not been paid by the Respondent.
Facts
Mr Petkov brought a claim for unlawful deduction of wages against PJ Bond Construction Limited. The Claimant worked as a worker for the construction company and was owed 10 days pay at a daily rate of £230. The hearing was conducted remotely by CVP with the Claimant representing himself and Mr P Bond representing the company.
Decision
The tribunal found that Mr Petkov was a worker within the meaning of section 230(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and that his claim for unlawful deduction of wages was well-founded. The Respondent was ordered to pay £2,300 representing 10 days unpaid wages.
Practical note
Workers are entitled to payment for all work performed, and failure to pay amounts to unlawful deduction of wages under Part 2 ERA 1996.
Award breakdown
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 6005508/2025
- Decision date
- 1 September 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- construction
- Represented
- No
- Rep type
- self
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No