Cases2201479/2024

Claimant v Bramwell Popham Ltd (in voluntary liquidation)

29 August 2025Before Employment Judge MossLondon Centralremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found claimant 1's dismissal to be unfair. The effective date of termination was determined as 31 October 2023. The respondent did not appear to defend the claim.

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found claimant 2's dismissal to be unfair. The respondent did not appear to defend the claim.

Wrongful Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal upheld claimant 1's wrongful dismissal claim, indicating dismissal without proper notice. The respondent did not defend.

Wrongful Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal upheld claimant 2's wrongful dismissal claim, indicating dismissal without proper notice. The respondent did not defend.

Holiday Paysucceeded

The tribunal found claimant 1 was owed accrued but unpaid holiday pay. The respondent did not contest the claim.

Holiday Paysucceeded

The tribunal found claimant 2 was owed accrued but unpaid holiday pay. The respondent did not contest the claim.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagesfailed

Claimant 1's claim for sick pay for sickness absence in November 2023 was dismissed. The tribunal found this complaint not well founded.

Failure to Inform & Consultnot determined

Claimant 2's complaint under TUPE regarding failure to inform and consult was reserved. The tribunal has not yet made a determination on this claim.

Facts

Two claimants, Ms C Thompson and Ms M Bramwell-Popham, brought claims against their former employer Bramwell Popham Ltd, which went into voluntary liquidation. Both claimants were dismissed with an effective date of termination of 31 October 2023. A TUPE transfer appears to have been involved. The respondent did not appear at the hearing.

Decision

The tribunal upheld both claimants' claims for unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, and unpaid holiday pay. Claimant 1's sick pay claim was dismissed. Judgment was reserved on claimant 2's TUPE failure to inform and consult claim and on remedy for all upheld complaints. The tribunal ordered taxation details for grossing up purposes.

Practical note

Where a respondent in liquidation does not appear, the tribunal will still determine liability on the merits, finding in favour of claimants where claims are well-founded, with remedy to be determined separately.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

TUPE 2006

Case details

Case number
2201479/2024
Decision date
29 August 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
other
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No