Claimant v BBA Remanufacturing Ltd in voluntary liquidation
Outcome
Individual claims
Tribunal found the first respondent made unauthorized deductions from claimant's wages for unpaid commission. Claimant was entitled to £585 gross for commission for the period 19-27 February 2024, calculated on the basis of 6 days work at an average of 6.5 sales per day at £15 commission per sale.
Tribunal found claimant was wrongfully dismissed and entitled to 2 weeks' notice pay of £1,104.58 (£552.29 net per week based on an average of his last 3 months' earnings including commission). Claimant limited his claim to statutory notice as he will pursue the remaining loss of earnings under the age discrimination claim.
Tribunal found claimant was entitled to 4.5 days of accrued holiday pay of £606.42, calculated at 4.5 times a day's pay of £134.76 based on his last 3 months earnings including commission.
Tribunal found the first respondent unfairly dismissed the claimant and awarded compensation of £1,071 consisting of a basic award of £571 and loss of statutory rights of £500. Loss of earnings was not awarded as the claimant chose to pursue this as part of the continuing age discrimination claim.
Tribunal found claimant did not receive particulars of employment compliant with s1 Employment Rights Act 1996, nor an update when his employer changed. Awarded an increase of £1,286 (2 weeks' gross pay capped at £643 per week). The respondent had provided partial terms when he began and written updates of employer names on pay statements.
The claim of age discrimination is continuing against all three respondents. The claimant chose to pursue his loss of earnings as part of that claim. This matter was not determined at this Rule 21 hearing.
Facts
The claimant was employed by BBA Remanufacturing Ltd, which is now in voluntary liquidation. The first respondent failed to respond to the claim by 25 May 2023. The claimant's employment ended on 27 February 2024 without proper notice. The claimant was owed commission for 6 days work, had not been paid for 4.5 days accrued holiday, and had not received compliant written particulars of employment. An age discrimination claim is continuing against all three respondents.
Decision
The tribunal made a Rule 21 default judgment against the first respondent. The claimant succeeded on claims for unlawful deductions (unpaid commission £585), wrongful dismissal (2 weeks' notice £1,104.58), holiday pay (£606.42), unfair dismissal (basic award £571 plus loss of statutory rights £500), and failure to provide written particulars (£1,286). Total award: £4,653 subject to tax and NI deductions on commission and holiday pay.
Practical note
Where a respondent company in liquidation fails to respond, a Rule 21 default judgment can be obtained for contractual and statutory claims, though enforcement may be problematic and claimants may strategically pursue loss of earnings through continuing discrimination claims against individual respondents.
Award breakdown
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 2301703/2023
- Decision date
- 27 August 2025
- Hearing type
- rule 21
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- default
Respondent
- Sector
- manufacturing
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No