Claimant v Generis Enterprise Technology Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The claimant lacked the minimum two years continuous service required by s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996 to bring an unfair dismissal claim. He was employed for less than two years. The claim was therefore struck out for lack of jurisdiction.
Facts
Mr Gray brought a claim for unfair dismissal against two respondents, Generis Enterprise Technology Limited and Camino Partners Limited. He was employed for less than two years. The judgment notes that he has other complaints which are not affected by this judgment.
Decision
The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claim on the basis that the claimant lacked the minimum two years continuous service required by s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant's other complaints remain live.
Practical note
Ordinary unfair dismissal claims require two years continuous service; this is a jurisdictional threshold that the tribunal will strike out claims that fail to meet even without a full hearing.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 6023246/2025
- Decision date
- 26 August 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Sector
- technology
- Represented
- No
Employment details
- Service
- 2 years
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No