Cases2501344/2024

Claimant v Durham Careline Limited

26 August 2025Before Employment Judge SweeneyNewcastle

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£21,097

Individual claims

Detrimentsucceeded

The tribunal found that the claimant was subjected to detriment for making protected disclosures under sections 48 and 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claim was well-founded and the tribunal awarded compensation for both injury to feelings and financial losses suffered as a result of the whistleblowing detriments.

Constructive Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found that the claimant was constructively dismissed under section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996, which relates to automatic unfair dismissal for whistleblowing. The claim was well-founded. The claimant was entitled to a basic award but had fully mitigated her losses by finding new employment, resulting in no compensatory award being made.

Facts

Nicola Abbott was employed by Durham Careline Limited in the healthcare sector. She made protected disclosures (whistleblowing) and subsequently suffered detriments as a result. The situation deteriorated to the point where she resigned and claimed constructive dismissal. She found new employment which fully mitigated her financial losses.

Decision

The tribunal upheld both claims, finding that the claimant suffered whistleblowing detriments and was constructively dismissed for making protected disclosures. She was awarded injury to feelings of £18,000, financial losses of £2,618, and a basic award of £479.11. No compensatory award was made as she had fully mitigated her losses through new employment.

Practical note

Employers who subject employees to detriments following protected disclosures face liability for both the detriments themselves and potential constructive dismissal, though claimants must mitigate their losses by seeking alternative employment.

Award breakdown

Basic award£479
Injury to feelings£18,000

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.47BERA 1996 s.48ERA 1996 s.103A

Case details

Case number
2501344/2024
Decision date
26 August 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
5
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister