Claimant v Community InfoSource

Complaint related to comment on 10 October 2022 ('let's not be conflictual') was time-barred and tribunal refused just and equitable extension. Tribunal lacked jurisdiction and dismissed claim.

Complaint related to alleged comments on 1 March 2022 about transgender identity was time-barred and tribunal refused just and equitable extension. Tribunal also found the alleged comments were never made. Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

All three alleged failures (work from home, supervision arrangements, mediation/counselling) were time-barred and tribunal refused just and equitable extension. Tribunal also found some adjustments were not reasonable, and claimant not substantially disadvantaged by PCPs compared to non-disabled persons.

Most victimisation complaints were time-barred. Of those in time, tribunal found claimant did three protected acts but none of the alleged detriments (protected conversation, settlement agreement presentation, garden leave, email revocation, grievance handling) were because of those protected acts. All victimisation complaints dismissed.

Claimant alleged constructive dismissal amounting to victimisation under s.39(4) EA. Tribunal found no acts of victimisation established, therefore constructive dismissal complaint as victimisation dismissed. Tribunal did not need to determine whether there was a constructive dismissal in employment law terms.