Cases6021537/2024

Claimant v Q Retail Stores Limited

25 August 2025Before Employment Judge ShulmanLeedsremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£4,583

Individual claims

Breach of Contractsucceeded

The claimant unconditionally accepted the job offer on 7 November 2024, creating a binding contract. When the respondent withdrew the offer on 22 November 2024, this constituted a breach of contract. The tribunal awarded reasonable notice of one month based on the seniority of the role and the three-month probationary period, rejecting the respondent's reliance on a blank contract that did not exist at the time of breach.

Facts

The claimant was offered a job as e-commerce manager on 6 November 2024 at £55,000 salary with a three-month probationary period, starting 10 February 2025. She unconditionally accepted on 7 November 2024. On 22 November 2024, the respondent withdrew the offer citing restructuring. No formal contract had been issued by the time of withdrawal, though the respondent produced a blank statement of particulars containing notice provisions.

Decision

The tribunal found that the claimant's unconditional acceptance on 7 November 2024 created a binding contract, and the respondent's withdrawal on 22 November 2024 was a breach of contract. The claimant was awarded one month's reasonable notice (£4,583.33 gross), calculated with reference to the seniority of the role and probationary period. The tribunal rejected reliance on the unissued contract terms and the claimant's claim for higher compensation.

Practical note

An unconditional acceptance of a job offer creates a binding contract even without a formal written contract, and withdrawal of the offer constitutes breach entitling the claimant to reasonable notice based on role seniority and circumstances, not terms in unissued contracts.

Award breakdown

Notice pay£4,583

Award equivalent: 4.3 weeks' gross pay

Legal authorities cited

Eastgate Storage Internet Services Limited v Toon UK EAT/0087/08Anderson v Indigo Accounting (UK) Limited ET/1804198/2022McCann v Snowzone Limited ET/3402068/2015

Statutes

Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 Article 3

Case details

Case number
6021537/2024
Decision date
25 August 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
retail
Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep

Employment details

Role
e-commerce manager
Salary band
£50,000–£60,000

Claimant representation

Represented
No