Cases2502528/2023

Claimant v Cumbria, Northumbria, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust

25 August 2025Before Employment Judge PittNewcastleremote video

Outcome

Partly successful

Individual claims

Direct Discriminationstruck out

The tribunal struck out discrimination complaints relating to alleged acts in paragraphs 3.1.1-3.1.7 covering 2013-2022 on the basis the claimant had no reasonable prospect of establishing they were part of a continuing course of conduct or that it would be just and equitable to extend time limits.

Direct Discriminationnot determined

The tribunal refused to strike out the complaint regarding David Muir in March 2023, finding the time limit issues (whether part of continuing conduct or just and equitable extension) should be determined at the final hearing.

Facts

The claimant brought discrimination complaints against his NHS employer covering alleged acts from 2013 to 2023. The respondent applied to strike out the older complaints (2013-2022) on time limit grounds. The tribunal heard a preliminary hearing to determine whether the claims should proceed.

Decision

The tribunal struck out discrimination complaints relating to alleged acts from 2013-2022, finding no reasonable prospect the claimant could establish they were part of continuing conduct or that a just and equitable extension was appropriate. However, the tribunal allowed the March 2023 complaint regarding David Muir to proceed to final hearing where time limit issues would be determined.

Practical note

At preliminary hearings on time limits, tribunals can strike out historical discrimination claims where there is no reasonable prospect of establishing continuing conduct or just and equitable extension, while allowing more recent allegations to proceed to full hearing.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a)

Case details

Case number
2502528/2023
Decision date
25 August 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
No