Cases4107434/2024

Claimant v The Watches of Switzerland Group Plc

25 August 2025Before Employment Judge N M HosieScotlandin person

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalfailed

The tribunal found the dismissal fair under s.98(4) ERA 1996. The employer had a genuine and reasonable belief based on reasonable investigation that the claimant had consumed alcohol on duty on 27 July and 5 April 2024. The investigation was adequate, interviewing four witnesses initially and re-interviewing them plus managers on appeal. The claimant admitted his alcohol use had 'gotten out of control' and the conduct breached the respondent's Hospitality & Alcohol Policy. Dismissal was within the band of reasonable responses for gross misconduct.

Facts

The claimant, a Sales Floor Manager at a Rolex Boutique in Glasgow with 15 years' service, was dismissed for gross misconduct after an anonymous whistleblowing complaint alleged he had been drinking alcohol at work. CCTV footage from 27 July 2024 showed him pouring whisky into a Coca-Cola can during working hours while acting as duty manager. Investigation revealed further allegations from 30 March and 5 April 2024 when colleagues witnessed him intoxicated on the sales floor. The claimant admitted his alcohol use had 'gotten out of control' but argued there was a permissive workplace culture that tolerated such behaviour. He was summarily dismissed on 23 August 2024 after a disciplinary hearing, and his appeal was rejected.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the claim, finding the dismissal fair. The tribunal was satisfied the employer had a genuine and reasonable belief based on adequate investigation that the claimant had engaged in gross misconduct by consuming alcohol during working hours in breach of company policy. The investigation included witness statements, CCTV review, and thorough appeal process. Despite the claimant's argument about workplace culture, the evidence established no such culture existed under current management. Dismissal was within the band of reasonable responses for a manager who was expected to set standards.

Practical note

Even with long service and previous good performance, consuming alcohol while on duty as a manager constitutes gross misconduct justifying summary dismissal where supported by CCTV evidence, witness statements, and the employee's own admissions, regardless of claims about workplace culture.

Legal authorities cited

Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd v Hitt [2003] ICR 111BHS v Burchell [1978] IRLR 379Iceland Frozen Foods v Jones [1983] ICR 17Adeshina v St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust UKEAT/0293/14Paull v East Surrey District Health Authority [1995] IRLR 305Hadjionnou v Coral Casinos Ltd [1981] IRLR 352London Ambulance NHS Trust v Small [2009] EWCA Civ 2020Western Recovery Services v Fisher EAT 0062/10Bowater v North West London Hospitals NHS Trust [2011] EWCA Civ 63Taylor v OCS Group Ltd [2006] IRLR 613

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.98(4)TULR(C)A 1992 s.207(2)ERA 1996 s.98

Case details

Case number
4107434/2024
Decision date
25 August 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
retail
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Employment details

Role
Sales Floor Manager
Service
15 years

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor