Cases6005759/2024

Claimant v Bidvest Noonan (UK) Limited

22 August 2025Before Employment Judge NorrisLondon Centralremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)failed

The tribunal found that the claim under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010 (discrimination arising from disability) was not well-founded and dismissed it.

Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments(disability)failed

The tribunal concluded that the respondent had not failed to make reasonable adjustments as required under the Equality Act 2010 and dismissed the claim.

Harassment(disability)failed

The harassment claim related to disability was not established on the evidence and the tribunal dismissed it as not well-founded.

Victimisation(disability)failed

The tribunal found that the claimant had not established victimisation under the Equality Act 2010 and dismissed this claim.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagesfailed

The tribunal determined that there had been no unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages and dismissed this claim.

Facts

Mr Ioannides brought claims against his employer Bidvest Noonan (UK) Limited alleging disability discrimination and unlawful deductions from wages. The case was heard over four days remotely via CVP. The claimant was represented by counsel on direct access while the respondent was represented by counsel instructed by Fieldfisher LLP.

Decision

Employment Judge Norris dismissed all of the claimant's claims, finding that the disability discrimination claims (section 15 discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, harassment and victimisation) and the unlawful deductions from wages claim were not well-founded.

Practical note

A claimant must establish all elements of disability discrimination claims including proving unfavourable treatment, knowledge of disability, and failure to justify actions or make adjustments.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.15

Case details

Case number
6005759/2024
Decision date
22 August 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
4
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
professional services
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister