Claimant v Lift and Load London Limited
Outcome
Facts
This is a preliminary hearing on the respondent's applications to strike out the claim and for a deposit order. The respondent argued the claim was out of time, that the complaints were criminal matters, and that the claim had no reasonable prospects of success. The claimant was represented by counsel, while the respondent was represented by a litigation executive.
Decision
The tribunal refused all of the respondent's applications. The strike out application was refused as premature, with the time limit issue to be decided at final hearing. The application based on the complaints being criminal matters was refused as the allegations required factual evaluation at the final hearing. The deposit order application was also refused as premature.
Practical note
Strike out and deposit order applications based on reasonable prospects arguments may be premature at an early stage before proper analysis of pleadings and core documents has taken place.
Case details
- Case number
- 2213509/2023
- Decision date
- 22 August 2025
- Hearing type
- preliminary
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- logistics
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister