Cases2213509/2023

Claimant v Lift and Load London Limited

22 August 2025Before Employment Judge FordeLondon Centralremote video

Outcome

Other

Facts

This is a preliminary hearing on the respondent's applications to strike out the claim and for a deposit order. The respondent argued the claim was out of time, that the complaints were criminal matters, and that the claim had no reasonable prospects of success. The claimant was represented by counsel, while the respondent was represented by a litigation executive.

Decision

The tribunal refused all of the respondent's applications. The strike out application was refused as premature, with the time limit issue to be decided at final hearing. The application based on the complaints being criminal matters was refused as the allegations required factual evaluation at the final hearing. The deposit order application was also refused as premature.

Practical note

Strike out and deposit order applications based on reasonable prospects arguments may be premature at an early stage before proper analysis of pleadings and core documents has taken place.

Case details

Case number
2213509/2023
Decision date
22 August 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
logistics
Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister