Cases6012191/2025

Claimant v S10 Holding Limited

21 August 2025Before Employment Judge IsaacsonLondon Centralremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£1,727

Individual claims

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages for the period of January to 3 March 2025. The respondent failed to pay £672.10 for January 2025 and £176.92 for March 2025, both of which were due to the claimant.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay commission payments of £50.20 and £58.19 that were owed to the claimant during his employment, constituting unauthorised deductions from wages.

Holiday Paysucceeded

The tribunal found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction by failing to pay the claimant for 4 days of accrued but untaken holiday when his employment ended on 3 March 2025. The daily rate was calculated at £192.32.

Facts

Mr Lambrianos was employed by S10 Holding Limited until 3 March 2025. The respondent failed to pay him wages for January 2025 (£672.10) and part of March 2025 (£176.92), as well as commission payments totalling £108.39. When his employment ended, the respondent also failed to pay him for 4 days of accrued but untaken holiday at a daily rate of £192.32.

Decision

The tribunal found all claims of unauthorised deduction from wages well-founded. The respondent was ordered to pay £1,726.69 in total, comprising unpaid wages for January and March, unpaid commission, and accrued holiday pay. The tribunal also declared that the claimant was an employee or worker at the relevant time.

Practical note

Employers must pay all wages, commission and accrued holiday pay owed to employees, and failure to do so constitutes unauthorised deduction from wages regardless of the reason for non-payment.

Award breakdown

Holiday pay£769
Unpaid wages£957

Case details

Case number
6012191/2025
Decision date
21 August 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
other
Represented
Yes
Rep type
in house

Claimant representation

Represented
No