Claimant v Royal Mail Group Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The Tribunal found that the dismissal of the claimant was in contravention of Section 15 of the Equality Act 2010. The dismissal amounted to discrimination arising from disability, as the tribunal determined it was not a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.
The Tribunal held that the respondent failed in its duty to make reasonable adjustments under Sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010. Specifically, the respondent should have found the claimant a part-time indoor role working three hours per day, which was a reasonable adjustment that was not made.
The Tribunal found the dismissal of the claimant unfair under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal concluded that the dismissal was not within the range of reasonable responses available to a reasonable employer in the circumstances.
Facts
Mr Sampson, a disabled employee of Royal Mail Group Ltd, was dismissed from his employment. The claimant required reasonable adjustments to continue working, specifically a part-time indoor role working three hours per day. The respondent failed to provide this adjustment and instead dismissed the claimant.
Decision
The Tribunal unanimously found in favour of the claimant on all three claims. The respondent discriminated against Mr Sampson by dismissing him (discrimination arising from disability), failed to make reasonable adjustments by not providing a suitable part-time indoor role, and unfairly dismissed him. An injury to feelings award of £18,000 plus interest was made, with remaining remedy issues adjourned.
Practical note
Employers must actively explore and implement reasonable adjustments for disabled employees, including modified roles with reduced hours, before resorting to dismissal, or risk successful claims for disability discrimination and unfair dismissal.
Award breakdown
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 2402811/2024
- Decision date
- 21 August 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 3
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- logistics
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- solicitor
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No