Cases2402811/2024

Claimant v Royal Mail Group Limited

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£20,209

Individual claims

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)succeeded

The Tribunal found that the dismissal of the claimant was in contravention of Section 15 of the Equality Act 2010. The dismissal amounted to discrimination arising from disability, as the tribunal determined it was not a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments(disability)succeeded

The Tribunal held that the respondent failed in its duty to make reasonable adjustments under Sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010. Specifically, the respondent should have found the claimant a part-time indoor role working three hours per day, which was a reasonable adjustment that was not made.

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The Tribunal found the dismissal of the claimant unfair under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal concluded that the dismissal was not within the range of reasonable responses available to a reasonable employer in the circumstances.

Facts

Mr Sampson, a disabled employee of Royal Mail Group Ltd, was dismissed from his employment. The claimant required reasonable adjustments to continue working, specifically a part-time indoor role working three hours per day. The respondent failed to provide this adjustment and instead dismissed the claimant.

Decision

The Tribunal unanimously found in favour of the claimant on all three claims. The respondent discriminated against Mr Sampson by dismissing him (discrimination arising from disability), failed to make reasonable adjustments by not providing a suitable part-time indoor role, and unfairly dismissed him. An injury to feelings award of £18,000 plus interest was made, with remaining remedy issues adjourned.

Practical note

Employers must actively explore and implement reasonable adjustments for disabled employees, including modified roles with reduced hours, before resorting to dismissal, or risk successful claims for disability discrimination and unfair dismissal.

Award breakdown

Injury to feelings£18,000
Interest£2,209

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.15Equality Act 2010 ss.20-21Employment Rights Act 1996 Part X

Case details

Case number
2402811/2024
Decision date
21 August 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
3
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
logistics
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Claimant representation

Represented
No