Cases6008802/2025

Claimant v Cidari Multi Academy Trust

20 August 2025Before Employment Judge LloydManchesterremote video

Outcome

Other

Individual claims

Automatic Unfair Dismissal(pregnancy)not determined

Tribunal allowed claim to proceed despite being out of time, finding it was not reasonably practicable for claimant to present claim in time due to debilitating mental health condition following birth of seriously ill baby requiring neonatal intensive care, and claim was presented within further reasonable period. Merit of claim not yet determined.

Direct Discrimination(pregnancy)not determined

Tribunal extended time limit on just and equitable grounds, finding claimant was very unwell during limitation period, receiving weekly mental health services for severe anxiety that prevented her leaving home, and only discovered role was filled on 5 March 2025, contacting ACAS four days later. No material prejudice to respondent from four month delay. Merit of claim not yet determined.

Facts

Claimant's employment ended 31 August 2024. She had given birth to a seriously ill baby on 4 March 2024 who spent time in neonatal intensive care. This caused claimant to develop severe mental health condition requiring specialist perinatal mental health services and weekly counselling, with anxiety preventing her from leaving home. She discovered on 5 March 2025 that Ms Bolton was still covering her maternity role, prompting her to contact ACAS on 9 March 2025 and file claim on 13 March 2025, over 4 months out of time.

Decision

Tribunal extended time limits for both automatic unfair dismissal (s.99 ERA) and pregnancy discrimination (s.18 EqA) claims, finding claimant's severe mental health condition following traumatic birth made it not reasonably practicable to present claim in time, claim was presented within further reasonable period once she discovered role was filled, and just and equitable to extend discrimination time limit given no material prejudice to respondent.

Practical note

Serious mental health conditions following pregnancy complications can justify extending strict employment tribunal time limits where claimant acts promptly once able and there is no material prejudice to the respondent.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

EqA 2010 s.18EqA 2010 s.123ERA 1996 s.99

Case details

Case number
6008802/2025
Decision date
20 August 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
education
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Claimant representation

Represented
No