Cases6016927/2025

Claimant v Assist Care

20 August 2025Before Employment Judge Meichenon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

The claimant had less than two years service and therefore did not meet the statutory qualifying period under s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant failed to give an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out.

Facts

Miss Kpani-Addy was employed by Assist Care for less than two years and was dismissed. She brought a claim for unfair dismissal along with other unspecified complaints. The judgment notes she was given an opportunity to explain why her unfair dismissal claim should proceed despite insufficient service but failed to provide an acceptable reason.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant did not have the statutory minimum of two years continuous employment required by s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant's other complaints remain unaffected and will continue.

Practical note

Unfair dismissal claims require two years qualifying service except in cases of automatically unfair dismissal, and claims lacking this will be struck out on jurisdictional grounds.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.108

Case details

Case number
6016927/2025
Decision date
20 August 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No