Claimant v East Anglia Home Improvements Limited

Outcome

Facts

The claimant brought harassment and victimisation complaints which proceeded to a full merits hearing in June 2025. At the outset, the tribunal refused the claimant's application for anonymisation. The claimant withdrew the victimisation complaint on the first day of trial. The tribunal dismissed the harassment complaints but awarded the claimant £4,775.92. The respondent sought costs of £7,500 relating to the unsuccessful anonymity application and withdrawal of the victimisation claim, but filed the application 12 days late.

Decision

The tribunal refused the respondent's costs application because it was made outside the 28-day time limit and discretion was not exercised to extend time. The respondent's reasons for delay (annual leave and needing to consider media coverage) were insufficient. The balance of prejudice favoured the claimant, given no good reason for delay, costs are exceptional in tribunals, and time limits provide certainty. In any event, no gateway for costs was established on the merits.

Practical note

Award breakdown

Legal authorities cited