Claimant v Millswoodhouse Telecoms Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found the claim was not well founded. The judgment records that the unfair dismissal claim failed following a three-day hearing where the claimant was self-represented and the respondent was represented by counsel.
Facts
M. V Huynh brought an unfair dismissal claim against Millswoodhouse Telecoms Limited. The case was heard over three days by video hearing at Reading Employment Tribunal. The claimant represented themselves while the respondent was represented by counsel Mr T. Finn.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim, finding it was not well founded. The respondent's application for costs relating to the third day of the hearing was also dismissed.
Practical note
This judgment provides no detailed reasoning, but illustrates the disparity in representation where a self-represented claimant faced a respondent with counsel and the claim ultimately failed.
Case details
- Case number
- 3311805/2024
- Decision date
- 20 August 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 3
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- telecoms
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No