Claimant v Mr Daniel Craig trading as Hush Hair & Beauty

The tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaint of direct race discrimination under Part 5 Equality Act 2010 after a five-day hearing. The tribunal found the claimant did not establish less favourable treatment because of race on the facts presented.

The tribunal dismissed the claimant's victimisation complaint under Part 5 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal determined the claimant failed to prove she was subjected to detriment because she had done a protected act.

The tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaint that she was refused the right to take adequate rest breaks under Regulation 12 Working Time Regulations 1998. The tribunal was not satisfied the respondent had breached the statutory rest break requirements.

The tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaint of unlawful deductions from wages. The tribunal found the respondent had not made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's pay contrary to the Employment Rights Act 1996.

The tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaint that she was not provided with itemised payslips as required by statute. The tribunal found no breach of the statutory obligation to provide itemised payslips.