Cases6017326/2025

Claimant v Birkenstock

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

The claimant did not have the requisite two years' continuous service required under Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to bring an unfair dismissal claim. The claim was struck out as the claimant had no reasonable prospect of success and failed to provide an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out.

Facts

Ceyhan Aslan brought an unfair dismissal claim against Birkenstock. The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years. The tribunal considered whether the claim should be struck out due to insufficient qualifying service.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim on the basis that the claimant did not have the required two years' continuous service under Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant failed to provide an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out.

Practical note

A claimant must have at least two years' qualifying service to bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim, and claims without such service will be struck out at a preliminary stage.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.108

Case details

Case number
6017326/2025
Decision date
18 August 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
1
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
retail
Represented
No

Employment details

Service
2 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No