Claimant v Amentum Clean Energy Ltd

The tribunal found the claimant had no reasonable prospects of showing he had two years' continuous service with the respondent as at the date of termination, which is required for ordinary unfair dismissal claims.

The tribunal found the claimant had no reasonable prospects of showing he had two years' continuous service with the respondent, which is required to claim a statutory redundancy payment.

The claim for automatic unfair dismissal for making a protected disclosure (whistleblowing) was specifically preserved and not struck out, as this type of claim does not require two years' service.

This claim was preserved and allowed to proceed as whistleblowing/protected disclosure claims do not require the two year qualifying period that applied to the other claims that were struck out.