Cases1602180/2023

Claimant v Royal Mail Group Limited

14 August 2025Before Employment Judge David Harrisremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)struck out

Struck out for want of particularisation of the disability discrimination claim, non-compliance with tribunal orders made on 26th February 2025 and 21st March 2025 requiring further information, and for not being actively pursued by the claimant.

Facts

The claimant brought a disability discrimination claim against Royal Mail Group Ltd but failed to adequately particularise the claim. The tribunal made orders on 26th February 2025 and 21st March 2025 requiring the claimant to provide further information, but the claimant failed to comply with these orders. The claimant appeared in person at the preliminary hearing while the respondent was represented by a solicitor.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim on three grounds: lack of particularisation giving the claim no reasonable prospect of success, non-compliance with tribunal orders requiring further information, and failure by the claimant to actively pursue the claim.

Practical note

Unrepresented claimants must comply with tribunal orders to provide particulars of their claims or risk strike-out, even before a full merits hearing.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024 Rule 38(1)(a)Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024 Rule 38(1)(c)Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024 Rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
1602180/2023
Decision date
14 August 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
1
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
logistics
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Claimant representation

Represented
No