Cases3307477/2023

Claimant v Sofa Club Ltd

11 August 2025Before Employment Judge M. HuntNorwichremote video

Outcome

Partly successful£3,634

Individual claims

Direct Discrimination(age)succeeded

The Tribunal found that the Claimant suffered age discrimination on 20 November 2022 contrary to section 39 of the Equality Act 2010. The complaint was well-founded and succeeded.

Direct Discrimination(sex)succeeded

The Tribunal found that the Claimant suffered sex discrimination on 20 November 2022 contrary to section 39 of the Equality Act 2010. The complaint was well-founded and succeeded.

Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments(disability)failed

The Tribunal found that the complaint of a failure to comply with the duty to make reasonable adjustments contrary to section 39 of the Equality Act 2010 was not well-founded and was dismissed.

Harassmentfailed

The Tribunal found that the complaints of harassment contrary to section 40 of the Equality Act 2010 were not well-founded and were dismissed.

Facts

Ms Quinn brought claims of age and sex discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and harassment against her former employer Sofa Club Ltd. The key discriminatory acts allegedly occurred on 20 November 2022. The Claimant represented herself while the Respondent was represented by counsel. The case was heard over three days remotely via CVP.

Decision

The Tribunal upheld the Claimant's complaints of age and sex discrimination on 20 November 2022, awarding £3,000 in compensation plus £633.86 interest. However, all other complaints including failure to make reasonable adjustments and harassment were dismissed as not well-founded.

Practical note

A self-represented claimant can succeed on specific discrimination claims even where other related claims fail, demonstrating the importance of identifying clear discriminatory incidents with specific dates.

Award breakdown

Compensatory award£3,000
Interest£634

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.39Equality Act 2010 s.40

Case details

Case number
3307477/2023
Decision date
11 August 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
3
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
retail
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
No