Cases8001568/2025

Claimant v ARRIA Data2 Text Limited

7 August 2025Before Employment Judge A KempScotlandon papers

Outcome

Default judgment£165,000

Individual claims

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

The respondent failed to present a response to the claim. Under Rule 22, the judge issued a default judgment on the available material. The claimant's contract showed an annual salary of £165,000 which had been unlawfully withheld, and the claim for this amount was granted in full.

Facts

The claimant was employed by the respondent on an annual salary of £165,000. The respondent unlawfully withheld the claimant's wages. The respondent failed to present any response to the claim before the employment tribunal.

Decision

The tribunal issued a default judgment under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £165,000 gross, representing unlawfully withheld wages equivalent to the claimant's annual salary.

Practical note

When a respondent fails to present a response, a tribunal can issue a default judgment under Rule 22, awarding the full amount claimed based on available evidence such as the employment contract.

Award breakdown

Unpaid wages£165,000

Award equivalent: 52.0 weeks' gross pay

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 Rule 22

Case details

Case number
8001568/2025
Decision date
7 August 2025
Hearing type
rule 21
Hearing days
Classification
default

Respondent

Sector
technology
Represented
No

Employment details

Salary band
£100,000+

Claimant representation

Represented
No