Cases8001665/2024

Claimant v More Blacks, More Dogs, More Irish Ltd

7 August 2025Before Employment Judge S MacLeanScotlandin person

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£18,151

Individual claims

Unlawful Deduction from Wageswithdrawn

The claim for unauthorised deduction of wages in respect of holiday pay was withdrawn by the claimant under rule 50 and dismissed under rule 51

Breach of Contractwithdrawn

The claim for breach of contract damages in respect of the last shift was withdrawn by the claimant under rule 50 and dismissed under rule 51

Harassment(race)succeeded

The tribunal found the second respondent made race-related comments including 'You look very Aryan with your blue eyes and blond hair' and 'Oh yeh forgot you like white people better' and 'How was Germany?'. These were unsolicited, appeared to derive satisfaction from the claimant's discomfort, and reasonably caused embarrassment and anxiety. Even if not intended as harassment, objectively viewed they had that effect.

Harassment(sex)succeeded

The tribunal found the second respondent made a sex-related comment relayed via a manager: 'You just get some females like that', referring to the claimant after she raised concerns about his threatening behaviour. It was reasonable for the claimant to be upset that such remarks were made about her to other staff, reflecting a low regard for women who did not agree with him.

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The first respondent cited conduct as the reason for dismissal, but the tribunal found no evidence of misconduct. The claimant's sales figures were comparable to colleagues. The dismissal appeared predetermined to avoid the claimant acquiring full statutory rights at the two-year mark, and was therefore for an unfair reason under section 98 ERA 1996.

Breach of Contractsucceeded

The first respondent failed to provide the claimant with notice of termination or payment in lieu, contrary to the terms of her contract and section 86 of the ERA 1996. She was entitled to two weeks' notice.

Othersucceeded

The first respondent breached its duty under section 92 ERA 1996 to provide written reasons for dismissal. The claimant had qualifying service and requested written reasons but received no response. She was awarded two weeks' pay as the statutory minimum.

Facts

The claimant was employed as a duty manager at a Glasgow pub from July 2022 to July 2024. During 2023, the sole director and second respondent made several comments to her: calling her 'Aryan' with reference to her appearance, suggesting she preferred white people, asking 'How was Germany?', and stating 'You just get some females like that' when she raised concerns about his threatening behaviour. On 11 July 2024, shortly before she would reach two years' service, she was summarily dismissed citing poor sales performance without prior warnings, evidence, notice, or written reasons.

Decision

The tribunal upheld the harassment claims for race and sex discrimination, finding the comments created an intimidating and offensive environment. The tribunal found the dismissal was unfair as it appeared predetermined to avoid statutory rights, with no evidence of misconduct. The respondents failed to attend or engage with proceedings. Total awards of £18,150.53 plus interest were made for injury to feelings, unfair dismissal, notice pay, and failure to provide written reasons.

Practical note

Employers who make inappropriate comments about race and sex, then dismiss employees just before they acquire full statutory protection without proper procedure or evidence, face substantial liability—especially when they fail to defend claims.

Award breakdown

Basic award£637
Compensatory award£13,839
Injury to feelings£2,000
Notice pay£637
Loss of statutory rights£400
Interest£322

Vento band: lower

Legal authorities cited

Vento v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2003] ICR 318

Statutes

Employment Rights Act 1996 s.92Employment Rights Act 1996 s.86Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 r.47Equality Act 2010 s.26Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 r.51Employment Tribunals (Interest on Awards in Discrimination Cases) Regulations 1996Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseekers Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 r.50Equality Act 2010 s.39Equality Act 2010 s.123

Case details

Case number
8001665/2024
Decision date
7 August 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
hospitality
Represented
No

Employment details

Role
Duty manager
Service
2 years

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor