Claimant v Brand Finance plc
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal held it lacked jurisdiction to hear the bonus claim as an unlawful deduction from wages because the bonus was discretionary and no decision had been communicated to the claimant during his employment. The amount was not quantifiable under the contract alone, rendering it properly a damages claim for breach of contract, which also fell outside tribunal jurisdiction as the bonus decision was made after employment ended.
The tribunal found it lacked jurisdiction under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994 to hear the bonus claim as a breach of contract because the breach did not arise from or exist at the termination of employment. The bonus decision was made after the claimant left employment in March 2024, with bonuses paid in June 2024.
The claim for unpaid freelance fees for work with a South African subsidiary was dismissed as out of time. Work ceased in June/early July 2024, payment should have been made by end of July 2024, but the claim was not presented until 6 November 2024. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to bring the claim sooner and the claimant did not act promptly.
Facts
The claimant worked for the respondent from March 2016 to March 2024. He resigned in November 2023 and worked his notice until 15 March 2024. After leaving, he worked on a freelance basis for the respondent's South African subsidiary on a project from mid-March to end of May 2024, invoicing for 19 days but claiming he worked 22 days. In June 2024, the respondent paid discretionary bonuses to remaining staff for the 2022-2023 financial year but did not pay the claimant a bonus. He brought claims for unpaid bonus and unpaid freelance fees.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed both claims for lack of jurisdiction and time limit issues. The bonus claim could not be brought as an unlawful deduction from wages because the discretionary bonus was not quantified or communicated during employment, making it a breach of contract claim outside tribunal jurisdiction as the breach arose after employment ended. The freelance fees claim was out of time as work ceased in June/July 2024 but the claim was not presented until November 2024, and it was reasonably practicable to present it sooner.
Practical note
Discretionary bonus claims where no amount has been communicated to an employee during their employment cannot be brought as unlawful deduction from wages claims but must be framed as breach of contract claims, which fall outside tribunal jurisdiction if the breach arises after employment terminates.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 6017676/2024
- Decision date
- 7 August 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- professional services
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Employment details
- Service
- 8 years
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No