Cases6027439/2025

Claimant v Thames Water Utilities Limited

7 August 2025Before Employment Judge LumbyCroydon

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Interim Relieffailed

The tribunal dismissed the claimant's application for interim relief. The judgment was given orally at the hearing with no written reasons provided in the judgment document.

Facts

Mr Dilloway brought a claim against Thames Water Utilities Limited and applied for interim relief. Both parties were represented by counsel at a hearing in Croydon. Oral reasons were given at the hearing but no written reasons were provided with the judgment.

Decision

Employment Judge Lumby dismissed the application for interim relief. The reasons for dismissal were given orally at the hearing but have not been requested in writing by either party.

Practical note

An interim relief application requires the claimant to demonstrate a pretty good chance of success at final hearing, and this threshold was not met in this case.

Case details

Case number
6027439/2025
Decision date
7 August 2025
Hearing type
interim relief
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
energy
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister