Cases2217466/2024

Claimant v Tradeplus24 Limited

7 August 2025Before Employment Judge GlennieLondon Central

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£140,115

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal to be well founded. The respondent did not attend to defend the claim. The claimant succeeded on this complaint.

Breach of Contractsucceeded

The tribunal found the complaint of breach of contract for failure to pay notice pay to be well founded. The respondent did not attend to defend the claim and the claimant succeeded.

Facts

The claimant Mr N Turfboer brought claims of unfair dismissal and breach of contract for failure to pay notice pay against his former employer Tradeplus24 Limited. The hearing took place on 5 August 2025 at London Central Employment Tribunal. The respondent neither attended nor was represented at the hearing. The respondent had also brought an employer's contract claim against the claimant.

Decision

The tribunal found both claims well founded in favour of the claimant. The tribunal awarded £115,115.00 for unfair dismissal and £25,000 for breach of contract relating to notice pay. The respondent's employer's contract claim was dismissed. The tribunal also awarded costs of £20,000 against the respondent for acting unreasonably in conducting the proceedings.

Practical note

Non-attendance by a respondent at tribunal can result not only in default judgment for the claimant but also significant costs awards for unreasonable conduct of proceedings.

Award breakdown

Compensatory award£115,115
Notice pay£25,000

Case details

Case number
2217466/2024
Decision date
7 August 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
other
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister