Cases1601164/2024

Claimant v Development Bank of Wales

6 August 2025Before Employment Judge T. Vincent RyanWalesremote video

Outcome

Other

Individual claims

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)not determined

This was a preliminary hearing solely to determine whether the claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of s.6 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal found that the claimant was disabled due to pain in his left leg, including DVT and related conditions, which had substantial and long-term adverse effects on day-to-day activities from July 2023 onwards. The merits of the discrimination claims were not determined at this hearing.

Facts

Dr Jones was employed by Development Bank of Wales from January to November 2023 in a desk-based role involving travel throughout Wales and England. From July 2023 he experienced persistent throbbing pain in his left leg, initially diagnosed as possible muscular pain, then DVT, and later post-thrombotic syndrome and superficial thrombophlebitis. He was prescribed blood thinners and painkillers. The pain affected his ability to sit, stand, and walk for extended periods, impacting his work including desk-based tasks and business travel. The respondent challenged his credibility, noting only one recorded day of sick leave, though evidence showed informal absences and reduced hours.

Decision

The tribunal found that Dr Jones was a disabled person within the meaning of s.6 Equality Act 2010 at the material time. The persistent throbbing leg pain constituted a physical impairment that had substantial adverse effects on day-to-day activities including sitting, standing, walking, and travelling. The tribunal applied the deduced effect principle, finding that without medication the pain would resume. The condition was long-term, likely to last beyond 12 months given symptoms persisted from July/August 2023 through employment and beyond, likely developing into post-thrombotic syndrome.

Practical note

Tribunals can determine deduced effect of medication on disability status using common sense where the purpose of medication is obvious (e.g. painkillers relieve pain) without requiring expert medical evidence, though should not speculate beyond what is obvious.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.6

Case details

Case number
1601164/2024
Decision date
6 August 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
financial services
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Employment details

Service
11 months

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister