Claimant v Green Light Traffic Management Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found the complaints of direct discrimination on grounds of disability were not made out on the evidence. Those claims not associated with the dismissal were out of time and the tribunal declined to extend time on just and equitable grounds.
The tribunal found the complaints of direct discrimination on grounds of age were not made out on the evidence. Those claims not associated with the dismissal were out of time and the tribunal declined to extend time on just and equitable grounds.
The tribunal found the complaint of discrimination arising from disability was not made out. Those claims not associated with the dismissal were out of time and the tribunal declined to extend time on just and equitable grounds.
The tribunal found the complaint of breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments was not made out. Those claims not associated with the dismissal were out of time and the tribunal declined to extend time on just and equitable grounds.
Facts
The claimant, Jason Morgan, was dismissed by Green Light Traffic Management Limited on 5 October 2023. He brought claims of disability discrimination (direct and arising from disability), age discrimination, and failure to make reasonable adjustments. The case was heard over five days in Swansea before a full tribunal panel.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed all claims. Most complaints related to matters before the dismissal and were found to be out of time, with the tribunal declining to extend time on just and equitable grounds. The remaining complaints associated with the dismissal itself were found not to be made out on the evidence.
Practical note
A self-represented claimant pursuing multiple discrimination claims must ensure they are brought within the statutory time limits, as tribunals will not automatically extend time even where discrimination is alleged.
Case details
- Case number
- 1600163/2024
- Decision date
- 6 August 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 5
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- construction
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No