Cases6005418/2025

Claimant v Andrew Graham

6 August 2025Before Employment Judge KM Rosson papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

The claimant was employed for less than two years and therefore did not meet the qualifying service requirement under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant failed to give an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagesnot determined

The unpaid wages claim was not affected by the strike-out and will proceed to a future hearing.

Facts

The claimant was employed by the respondents for less than two years. Following termination, he brought claims for unfair dismissal and unpaid wages. The respondents are Andrew Graham and Holmebrook Limited.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant had less than two years service and therefore did not meet the statutory qualifying period under section 108 ERA 1996. The unpaid wages claim was allowed to proceed.

Practical note

Unfair dismissal claims require two years continuous service unless the dismissal is automatically unfair, and claims without qualifying service will be struck out.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.108

Case details

Case number
6005418/2025
Decision date
6 August 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No