Cases1304746/2023

Claimant v Oncall Group Resources Limited

5 August 2025Before Employment Judge McGoughBirmingham

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalfailed

The tribunal determined that there was no transfer of an undertaking or business to the Respondent pursuant to TUPE 2006. Without a valid TUPE transfer, the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim against this respondent. The claim was therefore dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Facts

The Claimant brought an unfair dismissal claim against Oncall Group Resources Limited, asserting that his employment had transferred to them under TUPE 2006. The matter proceeded to a preliminary hearing to determine whether a TUPE transfer had occurred. The Claimant appeared in person while the Respondent was represented by a consultant.

Decision

The tribunal found that there was no transfer of an undertaking or business to the Respondent under TUPE 2006. Without such a transfer, the tribunal had no jurisdiction to determine the unfair dismissal claim, and it was therefore dismissed.

Practical note

A claimant must establish that a valid TUPE transfer occurred before the tribunal can exercise jurisdiction over claims arising from that alleged transfer.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006

Case details

Case number
1304746/2023
Decision date
5 August 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
professional services
Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep

Claimant representation

Represented
No