Claimant v The Royal London Mutual Insurance Society Limited

Claimant confirmed she misunderstood the law as related to the facts and withdrew the whistleblowing detriment claim under section 47B ERA 1996.

Claimant withdrew claims under sections 44 and 100 ERA 1996 relating to health and safety, accepting they were misconceived following discussion.

Claimant will argue she was segregated from guests at January 2023 sales conference because of her disability, and relies on events at grievance interview on 9 July 2024. Amendment allowed; to be determined at final hearing.

Claimant argues respondent's absence management policy (the PCP) results in particular disadvantage to those with her disability. Amendment allowed; to be determined at final hearing.

Claimant argues respondent failed to make adjustments to management information targets formal and failed to formalise working from home arrangement after pandemic. Amendment allowed; to be determined at final hearing.

Claimant accepted most alleged incidents did not meet legal definition of harassment but will rely on one incident: daily publishing of management information to distribution department. Amendment allowed; to be determined at final hearing.

Claimant will argue unfavourable treatment including being put on performance improvement plan and segregation at conference arose in consequence of her disability. Amendment allowed; to be determined at final hearing.

Claimant resigned on 18 November 2024 claiming breach of implied term of trust and confidence, with last straw being outcome of grievance appeal. Amendment to add this claim granted; to be determined at final hearing.