Cases6004631/2024

Claimant v Veolia ES (UK) Ltd

4 August 2025Before Employment Judge DowlingLondon Centralremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Holiday Payfailed

The tribunal found that the claimant resigned with immediate effect on 1 March 2024, despite his claim that he intended to work a four-week notice period. The respondent waived its right to the one-week contractual notice period and paid the claimant £1,293.76 for 10.36 days of accrued and untaken annual leave, a full account of any sums due. No further holiday pay was owed.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagesfailed

The claimant claimed unpaid wages for a period of sick leave between 1 and 28 March 2024 totalling £896.56. The tribunal found that the claimant's employment terminated on 1 March 2024 following his resignation with immediate effect. As the employment had already ended, there were no wages due for the period of alleged sick leave in March, and the claim for unpaid wages was unfounded.

Facts

The claimant, an HGV driver employed since November 2022, sent a resignation email on 3 March 2024 stating his resignation was 'effective from March 1st 2024'. He claimed he intended to work a four-week notice period ending 29 March and sought payment for holiday pay and sick pay during March. The respondent treated the resignation as taking immediate effect on 1 March, processed his termination, and paid him accrued holiday pay. The claimant returned his uniform on 7 March. His contract required only one week's notice.

Decision

The tribunal found that the claimant's resignation was with immediate effect on 1 March 2024, not subject to a four-week notice period. The respondent waived the contractual one-week notice period and paid the claimant in full for accrued holiday. The claims for unpaid holiday pay and unpaid wages failed because no further sums were due.

Practical note

Clear wording in resignation communications is critical; an ambiguous resignation effective date will be resolved by examining the parties' conduct and contractual terms, and employers are entitled to take unambiguous resignation language at face value.

Legal authorities cited

Sothern v Franks Charlesly & Co [1981] IRLR 278

Statutes

Working Time Regulations 1998Employment Rights Act 1996 s.13

Case details

Case number
6004631/2024
Decision date
4 August 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
environmental services
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Employment details

Role
HGV Driver
Service
1 years

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister