Cases4106669/2017

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

1 August 2025Before Employment Judge F EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out under rule 38(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue. Claimant failed to respond to tribunal's order of 20 June 2025 requiring written reasons by 11 July 2025 or request for hearing as to why claim should not be struck out.

Facts

Ms Friel brought a claim against Glasgow City Council and Glasgow Life in 2017. On 20 June 2025, the tribunal gave the claimant until 11 July 2025 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond or provide acceptable reasons.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to comply with the tribunal's unless order and provided no acceptable reason for the failure.

Practical note

Claimants must actively pursue their claims and comply with tribunal orders, or risk strike-out under rule 38(1)(d) for non-pursuit.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
4106669/2017
Decision date
1 August 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No