Cases6009100/2024

Claimant v Seepex UK Ltd

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalfailed

The tribunal found that the claimant's claim of unfair dismissal was not well founded. The judgment provides no detailed reasoning but the claim was dismissed following a two-day full merits hearing. The tribunal concluded the dismissal was fair.

Facts

Ms Barbara Ruiz Cendon brought an unfair dismissal claim against her former employer Seepex UK Ltd. The case proceeded to a two-day full merits hearing in Bristol. The claimant represented herself while the respondent was represented by counsel.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim, finding it was not well founded. The respondent's costs application was also dismissed. Oral reasons were given with either party able to request written reasons within 14 days.

Practical note

This is a formal judgment record where an unrepresented claimant's unfair dismissal claim was unsuccessful following a full merits hearing, with the respondent's costs application also being refused.

Case details

Case number
6009100/2024
Decision date
1 August 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
manufacturing
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
No