Cases3303718/2023

Claimant v West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Direct Discrimination(race)struck out

The claim was presented out of time and the tribunal determined it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit. Therefore the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the claim.

Direct Discrimination(religion)struck out

The claim was presented out of time and the tribunal determined it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit. Therefore the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the claim.

Harassment(race)struck out

The claim was presented out of time and the tribunal determined it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit. Therefore the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the claim.

Harassment(religion)struck out

The claim was presented out of time and the tribunal determined it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit. Therefore the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the claim.

Constructive Dismissalfailed

The tribunal dismissed the constructive unfair dismissal claim. The claimant failed to establish that the respondent had committed a fundamental breach of contract entitling them to resign and treat themselves as dismissed.

Facts

Mr Mohamed Razick brought claims against West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust for race and religion discrimination, harassment, and constructive unfair dismissal. The case was heard over five days at Watford Employment Tribunal. The claimant was represented by a lay representative while the respondent NHS Trust was represented by counsel.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed all claims. The discrimination and harassment claims related to race and religion were dismissed on jurisdictional grounds as they were presented out of time and the tribunal decided it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit. The constructive unfair dismissal claim was dismissed on its merits.

Practical note

Even with a five-day full merits hearing, discrimination claims can fail at the jurisdictional hurdle if time limits are not met and the tribunal does not exercise its discretion to extend time on just and equitable grounds.

Case details

Case number
3303718/2023
Decision date
1 August 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
5
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep