Cases1303390/2024

Claimant v Lloyds Banking Group

31 July 2025Before Employment Judge G SmartBirminghamremote video

Outcome

Other

Individual claims

Direct Discrimination(disability)not determined

The tribunal found it just and equitable to extend time for the direct discrimination claim dated 29 September 2023. The claim will continue, though jurisdictional issues remain to be determined at full trial.

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)not determined

Multiple disability discrimination claims submitted out of time. The tribunal has yet to determine whether they form an extended period of discriminatory conduct. Further preliminary hearing required to determine disability status for back problem impairment.

Facts

The claimant brought disability discrimination claims against Lloyds Banking Group which were submitted out of time. Day one of the preliminary hearing was adjourned early due to an incident involving a dependent of the claimant. The claims related to multiple allegations of discrimination, with a direct discrimination claim dated 29 September 2023 being the last pleaded act. The claimant has three impairments, including a back problem which remains subject to determination.

Decision

The tribunal granted a just and equitable extension of time for the direct discrimination claim of 29 September 2023 to proceed. Other jurisdictional issues regarding whether the claims form an extended period of discrimination remain to be determined at trial. A further preliminary hearing is required to determine whether the claimant's back problem constitutes a disability under section 6 of the Equality Act 2010.

Practical note

Even where disability discrimination claims are submitted out of time, tribunals retain discretion to extend time under the just and equitable test, but jurisdictional issues may still need separate determination at later hearings.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.6

Case details

Case number
1303390/2024
Decision date
31 July 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
financial services
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
No