Claimant v Mitie Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
Claim struck out for non-pursuit. Claimant failed to actively pursue the claim and failed to make representations or request a hearing in response to the tribunal's strike-out warning letter dated 24 June 2025.
Facts
Mr Singh brought an employment claim against Mitie Limited with case number 3323400/2021. The claim was not actively pursued by the claimant. The tribunal sent a letter dated 24 June 2025 giving the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to respond or make any sufficient representations.
Decision
Regional Employment Judge Foxwell struck out the claim on the papers because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant failed to respond to the tribunal's warning letter or request a hearing.
Practical note
Unrepresented claimants must actively pursue their claims and respond to tribunal correspondence, or face strike-out for non-pursuit without a hearing.
Case details
- Case number
- 3323400/2021
- Decision date
- 30 July 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Name
- Mitie Limited
- Sector
- professional services
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No