Claimant v Aerotron Composites Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal heard a three-day full merits hearing on the claimant's constructive unfair dismissal claim. After considering the evidence and submissions, the tribunal dismissed the claim, finding that the claimant had not established that the respondent had breached the implied term of trust and confidence or that she had been constructively dismissed.
Facts
The claimant, Celine Hudson, brought a constructive unfair dismissal claim against Aerotron Composites Limited. The case proceeded to a full merits hearing lasting three days before a full tribunal panel. The claimant represented herself while the respondent was represented by counsel. The tribunal heard evidence and submissions from both parties regarding the circumstances leading to the claimant's resignation.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's constructive unfair dismissal claim. The reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. The tribunal was not satisfied that the respondent had committed a fundamental breach of contract sufficient to entitle the claimant to resign and claim constructive dismissal.
Practical note
An unrepresented claimant failed to establish the necessary elements for a constructive dismissal claim at a three-day hearing before a full tribunal panel.
Case details
- Case number
- 6009652/2024
- Decision date
- 30 July 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 3
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- manufacturing
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No